The Elie Wiesel Living Archive

at The 92nd Street Y, New York. Supported by The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity

Protocols of Infamy: A Study of Anti-Semitic Forgery and Hatred

The Myths and False Conspiracies of the “Protocols of the Sages of Zion”

Sep 28, 2006

If ever a piece of writing could produce mass hatred, it was the so-called “Protocols of the Stages of Zion.” Professor Wiesel asks how such an infamous forgery had such a lasting impact. Looking at the origins and versions of the Protocols, Professor Wiesel reminds us that these “vile theories” of Jews planning to conquer the world were not new. He reads from a review of the Protocols in The London Times that initially accepted the Protocols as genuine. In 1920, just two years after the end of the war fought to prevent German world dominion, The Times spoke of the more dangerous and more secret threat of Jewish dominion. When people need scapegoats in times of war, revolution, economic troubles or plagues, conspiracy theories about Jews seem to fulfill that demand. To the question what we should do about this fanaticism of hatred, Professor Wiesel does not claim to have the answer but insists that education must be a major component.

Selected Quotes:
Subthemes:
1) The origins of anti-Semitism in Roman antiquity
2) Roman myth: Jewish expulsion from Egypt rather than liberation in the Exodus narrative
3) Myths of Jewish conspiracies toward world dominion in the “Protocols”
4) Sources and authorship of the “Protocols”
5) “Goal” and content of the “Protocols”
6) Accusations against freemasons in the “Protocols”
7) The treatment of the “Protocols” in British newspapers early in the 20th century
8) The “Protocols” – the plagiarism of Maurice Joly’s fiction
9) Conspiracy theories of the “Protocols” against Jews
10) Conspiracy theories of Hitler and Stalin
11) Hitler and Stalin’s blaming of the Jews
12) Archetypes of ancient and contemporary anti-Semitism
13) World reactions to the “Protocols”
Names:
Key Words:
Categories:
Tags: